Disarming the Resistance Is Wishful Thinking: Will Hezbollah Keep Its Weapons Forever?

Martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah repeatedly⁤ emphasized that the resistance’s⁣ arms‌ will not be ‍laid down provided that occupation persists on Lebanese soil.

The 14th of ‍August​ marked‌ the nineteenth anniversary of Lebanon’s major victory in the ​33-day war- a conflict that divided the history of‌ resistance into before and ⁣after,effectively ending Israel’s “Greater Israel” project. ​Following the war, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701⁢ was adopted. Upon its approval by the Lebanese cabinet, Hezbollah’s Secretary-General declared ​adherence to its terms.This moment marked nearly⁤ two ⁣decades of ongoing disputes over Hezbollah’s disarmament.

Over many years, especially during annual commemorations of this victory, Martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah ⁤delivered detailed statements explaining Hezbollah’s rationale ‌for remaining armed and ‌why⁤ forces aligned with global hegemony persistently demand⁢ their disarmament. As plans to disarm Hezbollah⁢ resurface through Lebanon’s ‌army ⁤and government initiatives today, ‍revisiting his ⁣insights proves particularly timely.

An essential question is why Hezbollah’s disarmament is so critical‌ to the Zionist axis. During the sixth anniversary​ celebrations of this victory,⁣ Nasrallah cited statements from⁢ Israeli officials explaining⁤ this ⁤urgency-chiefly tied to Israel’s total⁤ military failure⁣ to eradicate Hezbollah. He said: “moshe‌ Ya’alon, former Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, openly stated that ‘it is clear to me that Hezbollah is ⁣a ⁢deeply rooted phenomenon​ which​ cannot be destroyed through ⁤military ‍operations; likewise there is no definitive military solution⁤ against Hezbollah’s missile system.’ These⁤ remarks come from an ex-IDF‌ Chief and strategic theorist ​within the ​Zionist regime. Ya’alon stressed: ‘If you want ⁤to resolve Hezbollah’s weapons issue, look⁢ inside Lebanon itself.’ He continued: ‘I realized there is no way to uproot Hezbollah​ from ‍within Shiite hearts⁣ in Lebanon; I understood there was no way‌ to neutralize their Katyusha missiles.’‌ Thus he proposed‍ a political-military effort aimed at containing and limiting ⁣Hezbollah’s activities-an endeavor intended ultimately for Lebanese society⁤ itself to regard Hezbollah​ and its weapons as illegitimate.”

But ‍what⁣ logic drives a ⁤political party like Hezbollah-operating within a state ​with an ⁤independent army-to retain arms? At his first post-war⁣ celebration event ‍in Bint ⁢Jbeil, Nasrallah elaborated clearly: “The absence of a strong government capable‍ enough-and⁤ an effective army able-to end‍ occupation remains our‌ main reason for staying‍ armed.”

He added: “While we celebrate resistance today, I want ​those concerned about ⁢resolving ‌weapons issues⁣ with sorrowful heartaches not only talking about arms but healing causes instead of symptoms. Don’t just seek slogans ⁤or quick ⁤fixes; engage ‌us⁢ logically. Resistance results ‍from clear causes: occupation; hostage taking; water resource seizures; threats against‍ Lebanon; violations against our sovereignty-all urgent reasons behind⁣ it. Address ‌these root causes first-it then ‌becomes much easier to resolve outcomes respectfully when you establish a strong state protecting all lebanese citizens‌ fairly.”

Nasrallah‌ underscored that having an​ armed group inside one‌ country ⁢isn’t ideal-that Hezbollah ​will ⁣not remain permanently armed,but only when a resilient and capable government forms in Lebanon.

On this point he ⁣said explicitly: “I​ want all Lebanese people hear me clearly now-not merely reactive words sometiems expressed by ​me or my comrades-but let us speak responsibly here tonight.We do not say these arms should stay forever-it makes no sense at all for ⁢them to stay indefinitely.This weaponry must ​one day come to an end.The natural path lies in addressing underlying reasons directly-and thereafter⁣ results fix themselves naturally.Form such just governments safeguarding this country along‍ with⁢ its people-including soil,sources,and dignity-and solving matters related directly‍ with resistance won’t even require​ negotiations as solutions become ⁤straightforward.But rather‌ Israel continues encroaching-from Sheikh Abdallah Farms ‌slowly toward other borders inclusing Khiam,Mrouhin,and ⁢Dhahrat.Also‌ rather than acknowledging legitimate claims over Al Wazzani waters,it seeks‌ now thefts there too.How can ‍anyone protect⁢ their country or resources under‍ such conditions?”

He continued: “Thus any‍ talk nowadays about‍ handing over resistance weapons​ means surrendering Lebanon entirely into Israel’s hands-which⁤ would allow endless killings,captures,bombings-as ⁤well as losing⁣ our landsand waters.We ‌simply cannot accept such outcomes.It goes‌ without saying.”

This leads naturally toward ​another key question-with present political deadlock-including failure forming strong governance-rather how far will hezbollah defend keeping its arms? Nasrallah answered firmly:”No army⁣ can seize weapons forcibly from hands ‍holding faith-driven resistance tightly.”

The ⁣Secretary-General emphasized:”Relying on pressure,warnings,siege strategies trying⁣ disable/reserve ‍resistance amounts nothing.Efforts ‌wishing incite conflicts ⁣between Lebanese Armyand Resistance-a notion entertained by some-is futile.The ⁤Army (Jaysh)and Resistance share brotherhood ⁢bonds​ nobody can divide.I tell those dreaming about confiscating these arms through fresh wars-Israeli or ​otherwise-that while this loyal,honorable public‌ believes ​fully in it,nobody globally can wrestle these weapons‍ outta iron fists accompanied ‌glory-bound determination.”

“I do not threaten anyone except confiding deep belief placed upon those who⁢ embraced Resistance,” he stressed.”It rests fully ⁢upon nostalgic⁢ widow standing amidst ruins⁢ saying:”My Beirut home was destroyed,my southern home shattered,but we remain united behind Resistance including its armaments” along ⁣others asserting:”If Sayyed Hassan relinquishes his weaponry it’s outright betrayal.”To all great,resolute supporters therein‍ I vow:I desire neither treason nor disgrace closing⁣ my life-I prefer martyrdom boldly concluding my journey.So such ambitions hoping collapse ⁣are ⁣utterly ‍misplaced.For ⁣yours truly-a nation harboring steadfast defiance towards humiliation,outlawry,tiranny stands ‌ready offering blood,sacrifices preserving homeland honor!”

Nasrallah concluded:”indeed ‌today without⁤ exaggeration,Lebanon has transformed‍ regionally-not small anymore-but rather recognized global power.U.S.,West,and Israel⁢ completely integrate ‌us firmly within their calculations.And ⁣oppressed ‌nations worldwide look upon us reverently,honoring courage with highest esteem.To calm fears once again,I declare emphatically-we don’t intend holding onto weaponry forever.As ‌reiterated fifty times ‍previously-these aren’t internal ​tools.They’re⁣ never used internally.These are weapons belonging neither solelyShiites alone nor Christians⁣ alone.These belong collectively-to‌ Sunnis,Druze,andShiites alike.All‌ factions co-own them-they serve solely protectingLebanese ⁢sovereignty independence.I bind myself publicly-this⁤ nature,direction remains unwavering-and bound solemnly by God,masses,martyrs respectively.That correct resolution involves building robust,resilient,noble,valiant inclusive ⁤governing body where ⁢respect flourishes ‌freely everywhere!”

Mohammad⁣ Afraz ; Senior Strategic Affairs Analyst

News Sources: © webangah News Agency

دیدگاه‌ها

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *