The Israeli regime, following the martyrdom of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and recent regional developments, believes that now is the best possibility to deliver a final blow to the resistance front. Amid these circumstances,unprecedented pressure from the United States and some Western governments on Lebanon’s government to disarm Hezbollah is not a domestic initiative but part of a broader security engineering plan designed to benefit Israel. Although this plan is presented under slogans such as “monopoly of arms by the state” and “economic reconstruction,” it poses a serious threat to Lebanon’s future and that of the entire resistance axis.
The issue of disarming Hezbollah in Lebanon resurfaces every few years within local political discourse but today has reached a critical point due to intense foreign pressure combined with internal provocations. The U.S., sending its special envoy Thomas Barrack to Beirut, effectively dictates political and security conditions to Lebanon’s government. Notably surprising is how some parts of Lebanon’s power structure-including President Joseph Aoun-support this project; as if lessons from Syria’s bitter experience, ongoing israeli aggressions, and destructions after weakening the resistance were ignored by Lebanese officials.
A Project Serving U.S.and israeli Interests
Presenting itself under banners of “national sovereignty” and “state monopoly on arms,” this disarmament plan ultimately aims solely at implementing a U.S. strategy for ensuring complete security for the occupying regime in Israel. Washington-Lebanon army’s main equipment supplier and financier-is fully aware that removing Hezbollah will give it full control over Lebanon’s defence policies.Such an outcome would reduce Lebanon into a client state with an army dependent on foreign powers, incapable even of minor opposition against U.S. or Israeli agendas.
Hezbollah’s role in Defending Lebanon
Hezbollah has played a decisive role not only against Israeli invasions but also against internal threats like ISIS and regional dangers. This movement has defended all Lebanese people-not just Shiites-with thousands of martyrs alongside considerable human and material costs borne for their dignity and honor. While frequently enough observing passively during incursions by external enemies, both Lebanese government forces have done little compared with Hezbollah fighters who prevented enemy advances from altering security balances decisively. Weakening Hezbollah-the only true protector of Lebanese territorial integrity-will turn Beirut into a weakened puppet government fully reliant on American military support without daring any defiance toward Washington or Tel Aviv.
Perilous Consequences of Disarmament
Dismantling Hezbollah’s military capability means removing one main pillar within the axis of resistance-a move dangerous not only for Lebanese Shiites but throughout the region since Israel methodically seeks weakening than eliminating other links within this chain step-by-step.History shows surrendering under U.S.-Israeli pressure does not diminish threats but amplifies them.
An Choice Path: Resistance Tactics Without Civil War
The timely strategic visit by Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, sends clear signals: Iran remains committed to supporting Hezbollah along with liquidity in maintaining stability in Lebanon.
Hezbollah understands well that provoking internal conflict serves Israel’s primary interest by undermining national unity in Lebanon; therefore opposing disarmament must rely on smart nonmilitary strategies:
- Ignore practical enforcement efforts aimed at disarming while focusing heavily on providing social services including health care and education across Shiite areas-a policy initiated since 2025 boosting grassroots support;
- Form internal alliances among christian & Sunni groups opposed to American agendas aiming to block legislative approval regarding arms removal;
- Launch media campaigns titled “We Will Not Relinquish Our Weapons” across social networks plus Arab-Lebanese media outlets emphasizing resistance’s vital role defending national sovereignty while exposing disarmament proposals as American-israeli conspiracies;
- Use parliamentary mechanisms strategically keep discussions about weapons strictly domestic matters preventing foreign intervention;
- Joseph Aoun must recognize his presidential tenure was contingent upon Hezbollah support-and now must resist Western pressures demanding its disarmament.
Conclusion
The decision regarding Hezbollah’s disarmament extends beyond an internal Lebanese matter; it forms part one major scheme orchestrated by Washington-Tel Aviv aimed at reshaping regional security favorably toward themselves. If executed fully, it deprives Lebanon from its sole effective deterrent facing Israeli aggressions opening doors wide for total enemy domination.
The resistance weapons are not threats inside lebanon-they guarantee its dignity,independence,& security alike everywhere therein-from any ruling administrations opting out risk deep regret because without resilience independent Lebanons become defenseless dependent states vulnerable otherwise stolen peace foundations altogether hinge firmly united front recognizing these challenges collectively outmaneuver skillfully preserving vital safeguards ahead consecutively intact throughout region-wide warfare scenarios framing key stakes favor universal freedom onwards stages ahead lasting better futures
دیدگاهتان را بنویسید