دسته: news

With the declaration of a ceasefire between Iran and⁢ the Zionist regime, key‌ legal questions arise: What obligations have been imposed on both parties? What are the responsibilities of international institutions? And is a ​ceasefire equivalent to peace?

From an international law perspective, there is a basic ‍distinction between peace (Peace) and a ceasefire (Ceasefire), ⁣with ​notable legal implications for ⁤warring parties and international bodies.

A ceasefire (Ceasefire/Armistice) is a temporary-frequently enough immediate-agreement​ to halt armed conflict without ⁤resolving underlying disputes. It might potentially be bilateral, unilateral, or enforced by ‍international organizations. Ceasefires carry political-military weight⁣ but are not necessarily legally ⁣binding or permanent; they can be declared verbally, in writing, or via⁣ UN security Council resolutions.In contrast,a⁤ peace agreement (Peace Agreement) represents a ⁢comprehensive settlement typically achieved through negotiations-sometimes​ with mediation.

A ceasefire addresses political, legal, territorial, and security dimensions but does not constitute an official ⁢end to ⁢war under international​ law.Peace ‍requires⁢ signing a treaty ‍(Peace Treaty)-which ​under⁣ Iran’s Constitution must be ratified⁢ by parliament. The ⁢current situation remains strictly a ceasefire; labeling it⁣ as peace ‍would be inaccurate.

The legal status​ of both parties during this truce raises⁢ critical issues: Does this pause⁢ prevent accountability for crimes against peace or wartime atrocities committed by the Zionist regime?

Crucially:

1. A ceasefire suspends hostilities without terminating them legally-both nations remain in an ‌”international armed conflict.” Violations could constitute‌ serious breaches of armed conflict laws.
2. The UN Security Council may intervene under Chapters VI/VII (sanctions/peacekeeping) if violations occur.
3. War crimes prosecutions persist regardless:
   • Attacks on civilians;
   • Tactical strikes on hospitals/Red Crescent teams/media infrastructure;
   • Terrorizing civilian facilities (power‍ plants/schools/water sources).

The Zionist⁣ regime’s recent aggression against Iran violated ⁢UN Charter principles-qualifying as non-prescriptible “crimes against peace” prosecutable by the International Criminal court⁢ (ICC).Therefore:

4. The wartime status persists despite ​truce terms;
5. Truce violations carry legal consequences;
6. The bloodthirsty Zionist regime remains liable for ​its wartime crimes/crimes against peace-requiring vigorous pursuit‍ through‌ diplomatic-legal channels.

News Sources: © webangah ⁢News Agency‍

Pakistan’s ‌Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif commended Iran’s valiant response to Israeli attacks ⁢during his remarks today, as ‌reported by webangah News Agency.

“There is no⁤ doubt that Israel committed aggression against Iran,” he⁢ stated. ‌”Iran exercised its legitimate right to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Sharif ​also noted that pakistan’s Army Chief General Syed ⁣Asim Munir met with ​Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Seyed Abbas Araghchi⁤ on the sidelines‍ of the ‌recent OIC Foreign Ministers’ meeting in Istanbul.

During the 90-minute discussion, Pakistan’s military leader briefed Araghchi on⁤ Islamabad’s diplomatic efforts to support Tehran ⁣and help ⁣end the conflict.

Yemen’s Ansarullah leader Abdul-Malik al-houthi congratulated Iran for achieving a “major victory” against ⁢what‍ he described as the⁣ “aggressive,oppressive,and criminal Israeli enemy.” In a statement reported by webangah News Agency, al-Houthi extended his congratulations to the Islamic⁢ world, emphasizing that this triumph benefits​ all Muslims globally.

He further stated that the defeat suffered by Israel ​and its “criminal partners”-primarily the U.S., U.K., Germany,​ and France-represents a victory for the entire Islamic nation.

David Barnea, head of Israel’s‌ Mossad intelligence​ agency-who rarely makes public statements-expressed gratitude to the U.S. Central‌ Intelligence Agency ⁣(CIA) ⁢for its “substantial involvement” ​in the ​conflict with Iran, according⁢ to a report by webangah News Agency.

The acknowledgment comes amid contradictory claims by ‍former U.S. ‍president Donald Trump, who initially denied direct⁤ involvement in military ⁤operations before later admitting his role and attempting to⁣ escalate hostilities-only to backtrack after ‍Iran’s decisive retaliation.

barnea credited Israel’s “success” in the war to‍ Mossad leadership’s decision-making while asserting⁣ his agency‌ monitors all of ⁢Iran’s ⁢strategic ‍projects “with full awareness.”

The 12-day conflict left Israel in crisis after precision strikes by ‌Iranian missiles ‍hit critical economic,military,and security infrastructure. Despite initial ambitions ​for the offensive,Israel sought Trump’s⁣ intervention before unilaterally halting hostilities.

While Iran suffered human and material losses-including martyred military commanders and nuclear scientists-analysts ​suggest the war ⁤accelerated what Zionist prognosticators describe as Israel’s ‌inevitable collapse as it approaches its 80th anniversary.

The American magazine Popular Mechanics reported ‍that while the⁢ U.S. targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities with bunker-buster bombs during an attack, ​the facilities likely remained intact due to ‍Iran’s advanced concrete technology, according to ⁢a report by‍ webangah News Agency.

The analysis attributes this resilience to the composition and ⁢design of Iran’s​ specialized concrete, which has reportedly withstood repeated tests against penetrating munitions​ in what the magazine describes ​as a “silent war.”

The report cites an ⁢incident in the early 2000s where a U.S. bunker-buster bomb struck an underground Iranian ‌structure but failed to demolish it-instead becoming lodged within the material unexpectedly.

Popular Mechanics emphasized that Iran has⁤ as pioneered ultra-resistant concrete formulations, achieving superiority against such⁢ weapons. Earlier​ iterations of concrete were vulnerable to bunker-busters, but⁢ breakthroughs in steel-fiber-reinforced composites altered this dynamic.

The findings align with prior U.S. intelligence ⁢assessments confirming ‌Iranian nuclear facilities survived aggressive strikes.

According to webangah ⁢News Agency, Hebrew-language media outlets have reported that France confirmed its assistance to Tel Aviv‌ in intercepting Iranian drones during the conflict.

Despite French support and ‌multiple layers of the Zionist regime’s air defense ⁤systems, Iranian missiles and⁤ drones successfully struck ‍their ​intended targets within the occupied territories, causing‍ widespread destruction.

According to ‍ webangah News Agency, ⁣citing Mehr News Agency, Mohammad al-Dulaimi, a member of⁢ Iraq’s allied Anbar Coalition, confirmed that Mossad intelligence services​ are planning to manufacture drones bearing Iranian flags‌ to target security bases‌ within Iraq.

He added:⁢ Tel Aviv aims to accuse Iran through these attacks ⁣and strain relations between​ Tehran ⁤and‌ Baghdad.

Al-Dulaimi⁤ emphasized: Mossad continues its efforts to ⁢destabilize both Iraq and⁣ Iran through various⁣ means.

Previous reports indicated‌ that ⁤some⁤ suicide‌ drones had targeted positions held by Iraqi security forces.

According to a report by webangah News Agency, Channel 12 of the Zionist ⁤regime’s television acknowledged that the regime ⁢must monitor Yemen and prevent‍ advancements in its missile ⁢technology.

The report further stated: “During Israel’s war​ with⁢ Iran, Yemen was closely observing us.”

It emphasized: “Our intelligence coverage of‍ them is‌ extremely limited, and we lack⁣ considerable facts​ about Yemeni activities.”

Notably, Yemen’s armed forces⁣ have provided military support to Gaza residents since ‍the ‍Zionist regime’s aggression on the Strip began.