بلاگ

According too webangah news agency, Jordan’s King Abdullah II and French President emmanuel Macron met on the sidelines of the 3rd International Conference on Protecting Water Resources​ of‌ Oceans‍ and Seas in Nice, France. the meeting,‌ attended by Jordanian Foreign ⁤Minister Ayman Safadi and Ambassador ‍Lina Hadid, emphasized the importance of continued coordination between both ‍countries regarding regional developments.

The leaders stressed the need ⁣for comprehensive de-escalation efforts, a Gaza ceasefire, and guaranteed⁢ humanitarian aid delivery to the Strip. A Royal Court statement noted King Abdullah reaffirmed Jordan’s commitment to strengthening bilateral relations with France across multiple‍ sectors to help stabilize the Middle East.

The monarch specifically⁢ praised​ Paris’ pivotal role in ⁤supporting a two-state solution peace process and organizing an upcoming conference scheduled for September 17-20 in New ⁣York with Saudi cooperation. He warned against escalating tensions⁢ in jerusalem ⁣and‌ the West Bank caused by Israeli‍ actions.

king Abdullah reiterated that granting Palestinians their full⁢ legitimate ‌rights remains ‍”the only path to​ regional stability.”

according to webangah News ⁢Agency, Iran’s ambassador and permanent representative to the ‍IAEA responded to the agency’s director general’s remarks on Iran’s nuclear program,⁤ calling all allegations politically⁤ motivated.

The senior‌ Iranian diplomat told Al-Mayadeen that Tehran will ⁤counter any political ​move ‌by the IAEA.

The Vienna-based‌ correspondent of Al-Mayadeen also noted that the U.S. ⁣played a key role ⁢in drafting a‍ European-proposed resolution submitted to the IAEA Board of Governors.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi reiterated ⁤claims about Iran’s nuclear program during a press conference today,alleging that the agency had ​discovered traces of man-made uranium particles at three ⁣undeclared sites ⁣in Iran-Varamin,Marivan,and Turquzabad-where it gained complementary access in 2019 ‌and 2020.

Grossi⁣ added: “The IAEA does not make accusations; ⁢we report based on ‍thorough investigations.Due to incomplete or unsatisfactory responses from‍ certain countries, we cannot confirm whether some activities are solely peaceful. This lack of clarity ‍requires heightened scrutiny.”

Despite years of⁤ cooperation between Iran⁤ and the IAEA, Grossi claimed Tehran had either failed to address these ambiguities or provided inadequate technical answers. He further alleged attempts by Iran to sanitize⁣ these sites,hindering verification efforts.

“Iran’s approach toward engagement wiht ⁢the IAEA is largely influenced by ⁣progress in other related negotiations,” Grossi said. “Positive ⁤developments there would lead to​ reciprocal behavior here. ‍While changes may not⁤ be immediate or sweeping, mutual progress ⁤is underway as part of ongoing diplomatic processes.”

The al-Quds brigades, the military wing of ‌the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement, stated⁢ it⁤ had taken control of an Israeli regime “Ivo Max” surveillance‍ drone east of Jabalia camp in northern Gaza, according to webangah News Agency.

The brigades reported ‌obtaining notable intelligence and​ coordinates from the captured drone ⁣in eastern Jabalia.

Since the outbreak of war in Gaza on October 7, 2023 -‌ marked by Hamas’s unprecedented “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation⁣ – the Israeli military has faced a series of heavy blows with profound tactical, psychological and strategic‌ consequences.‍ Palestinian ‍resistance forces have inflicted considerable⁣ damage through irregular warfare tactics including tunnel networks, precision ambushes and coordinated explosions.

Over‍ eighteen months of ‍conflict, Zionist sources acknowledge hundreds ⁣of military fatalities while unofficial estimates indicate higher casualties with‌ thousands wounded.⁣ The resistance has successfully destroyed or captured dozens of Merkava tanks, armored ‌vehicles, drones ⁤and advanced reconnaissance systems belonging‌ to Israel’s⁢ military apparatus.

Many observers contend that despite heavy costs, Palestinian‌ resistance has fundamentally ⁢altered battlefield equations -‍ trapping Israel’s army in a costly war of attrition with no‍ clear⁢ victory scenario‌ for ‍the occupying forces.

The ⁤spokesperson for the United Nations‍ peacekeeping forces in southern lebanon (UNIFIL) emphasized that the Israeli army must withdraw from its occupied positions in the region, according to a report by webangah News Agency.

Andrea Tenenti,UNIFIL’s spokesperson,stated in an‍ interview with Al-Mayadeen: “There have been no discussions about ending UNIFIL’s operations.This ⁣matter will ​be reviewed ‍by ⁤the Security Council-the sole authority responsible for determining the necessity and effectiveness of UNIFIL’s presence in southern Lebanon.”

He clarified: “No talks have ⁢taken place regarding terminating UNIFIL’s mission.We continue our operations and coordination⁢ with the Lebanese army. Our priority is restoring stability to southern‌ Lebanon, which requires israeli forces to withdraw from occupied‍ territories.”

The spokesperson noted that “the ⁤Lebanese army remains committed to implementing UN Resolution 1701 and maintaining its deployment in the south. I make no distinction between French forces and UNIFIL-all are fulfilling​ their duties under Resolution​ 1701.”

These remarks⁤ followed claims by some Zionist regime-affiliated media outlets alleging that the U.S. and Israel had decided to terminate UNIFIL’s operations.

According to webangah News Agency, Al Jazeera analyst Saeed ziyad‍ examined the ⁣recent clashes‍ between Palestinian fighters ​and Zionist forces in Gaza, decoding the strategic implications of these developments.

Ziyad highlighted‌ the Zionist regime’s tactical weaknesses in close-quarters and ground battles against Palestinian resistance fighters, citing its significant casualties over the past month in Gaza.

Saeed Ziyad ‍argued that ‍by inflicting human losses on Zionist troops, Palestinian⁢ resistance could strengthen its bargaining position to force a ceasefire.

The analyst also explored the⁣ religious symbolism behind the ‌naming of ⁢these military operations.