برچسب: Iran news

webangah News Agency: Miraj-ul-Huda Siddiqui, a senior leader of Pakistan’s Jamaat-e-Islami, told webangah News Agency that regional developments following October 7, 2023, ‍prove “the spirit of Iran’s Islamic Revolution stands behind every liberation movement for Jerusalem’s freedom.” ‌He emphasized that Israel’s assassination of Hamas leader Ismail ⁢Haniyeh⁢ in Iran after Operation Al-Aqsa Flood demonstrates⁤ Israel fully recognizes Iran’s pivotal role in the Axis of Resistance.

The Pakistani political⁢ figure added that on June 13, Israel launched a large-scale aggression against Iran. ⁣Within the country, Mossad⁢ operatives have reportedly targeted military ⁤leaders and nuclear scientists.

The strike,described by Iran as a “missile ambush,” reportedly destroyed the consulate building and left no survivors. webangah News Agency​ (Follow) cited military sources confirming meaningful damage.

In response to recent U.S. ⁤airstrikes ‍against Iranian-aligned forces, Tehran warned that Washington’s targeting of the “Al-Adid” airbase in Qatar could escalate tensions beyond control. These developments have positioned Iran as a global power capable of direct confrontation with America.

president Ebrahim Raisi declared Iran would not retreat ⁣militarily or ideologically following these events, stating: “Our response won’t be limited‌ to military action-we’ll demonstrate superior strategic thinking.” Analysts interpret this as signaling intensified asymmetric warfare tactics.

The Pakistani ​political figure, in response to threats against Ayatollah Khamenei, declared: “If God does not ​thwart attempts to⁢ harm ⁤Ayatollah Khamenei, not only the people of Pakistan but freedom-seeking individuals ‌worldwide will respond.” He ⁤described Pakistan as a nation that courageously defends revolutionary leadership and‌ holds Ayatollah Khamenei in high‍ esteem while praying for ‍his safety. Support for this stance extends beyond Islamic communities to every free citizen‍ in Pakistan who stands with Ayatollah Khamenei.

Dr.Siddiqui concluded: “While many Muslim ⁣rulers remain silent against Western arrogance, Iran sufficiently demonstrates…” [webangah News Agency](Follow)

The individual demonstrated unwavering commitment to‍ upholding the principles of Islam ‍through steadfast resistance.

webangah News‌ Agency – Ursula Asta, ​an Argentinian geopolitical ⁢analyst, interprets Israel’s actions as part⁣ of a broader Western project to sustain ⁢hegemony and prevent ⁢the erosion of U.S.-led unipolarity. Highlighting‌ Israel’s political fragility and the influence of neoconservatives in Washington,she argues that‌ Tel Aviv’s aggression‌ toward ⁤Iran stems not from security concerns but from efforts to ‍weaken the Axis of Resistance and⁢ block Tehran’s integration into⁣ a ⁤multipolar⁤ world order.

Recent weeks have seen overt‌ Israeli aggression ⁢against Iran and its people. Why does this regime commit such crimes against defenseless civilians in Gaza, Lebanon, ⁢and ​Iran? ⁤What drives its​ escalation?

Netanyahu has‌ multiple motives for provoking war with Iran-a​ conflict now directly involving the U.S.,‍ which had previously⁢ only defended Israel politically.His weakening legal standing ⁢and unstable coalition⁢ make war a tool for political survival. Strategically,Iran obstructs‌ Israel’s expansionist ambitions while U.S. domestic⁤ turmoil empowers Zionist lobbies ⁢seeking regional control.

Israel claims to target Iran’s nuclear program yet bombs hospitals, infrastructure, and⁢ media centers-killing ⁢women and children. How‌ do you explain this contradiction?

Israel systematically sabotages nuclear negotiations between ‌tehran and Washington while ⁢conflating nonproliferation with regime-change rhetoric.

Despite UN documentation of Israeli war crimes, Western nations continue military-political⁢ support.⁢ Why this silence?

The Trump administration housed neoconservatives who⁢ championed greater​ israel as ‌part of America’s ⁣”New Century Project”-a bid to ⁤reassert fading global dominance through Middle East control.

“We are experiencing⁣ World War III piecemeal,” Pope Francis observed astutely amid shifting Afro-Eurasian power dynamics where⁢ Israel serves as a Western fortress.

Western media​ frames Israeli actions as ​self-defense while ignoring​ civilian massacres. How‌ can ⁣this bias be ⁣countered?

The mythic Iron ‌Dome ‍proves fallible; those claiming⁢ victory mourn instead of⁤ celebrating⁤ at home despite controlling narratives across hemispheres like South America where option media struggles for balance amid tech-driven exposure of atrocities once suppressed by⁤ mainstream ‍outlets.

The Long Game: ​BRICS vs Unipolarity

‌
Iran-Saudi rapprochement ‌mediated by China exemplifies regional⁤ realignment toward emerging powers ⁤challenging Western primacy-with BRICS expansions including Egypt/UAE accelerating⁤ structural shifts even SCO members Russia/China deepen ties via energy-infrastructure pacts with Tehran.
‌
Meanwhile blocking humanitarian aid constitutes another front in hybrid warfare where journalists die so truths⁢ distort-yet hypocrisy laid bare when⁢ nuclear-armed Tel Aviv vilifies monitored states under IAEA scrutiny ⁢it evades itself​ since 1979 revolution marked Islamic Republic becoming ​Zionism’s chief regional foe.

Three concurrent Eurasian ‍conflicts (Ukraine-NATO-Russia⁣ tensions/Taiwan flashpoints/Mideast⁢ volatility) reflect American ​hegemony ‍unraveling through imperial overreach contradicting postwar multilateral frameworks now obsolete before emergent orders demanding accountability beyond veto shields abused at UNSC sessions masking decline behind militarized budgets/tariff wars on​ competitors like⁣ beijing whose‍ rise ​anchors multipolar​ inevitability.

A leading Arab world analyst emphasized, “I believe that after ‌suffering defeat against Iran, Israel will ​likely reconsider its calculations a ⁤thousand times before ⁤any‌ new​ act of aggression.”

According to a ⁢report by webangah News Agency, ⁣citing Israel’s “Seregim” news platform, the US ‌Department of Defense (Pentagon)‌ recently acknowledged that Iran’s missile program has been delayed ‍for approximately two years. The report states that this ‌assessment has led to significant unease in Israel, as it failed‍ to completely ⁣neutralize Iran’s missile capabilities and only managed to⁤ delay Tehran’s ‌progress for about two years.

The Israeli outlet⁤ admitted⁣ that Israel had⁣ hoped ​the US would target Fordow’s nuclear facilities, either fully⁤ destroying them ⁢or rendering them inoperable for years.

The Pentagon had earlier ⁤dismissed claims by former US President ​Donald Trump regarding

Former U.S.President Donald Trump and other senior american officials ​have repeatedly ‍claimed that these​ attacks would ⁢permanently ​neutralize Iran’s missile ‌capabilities.

According to webangah ⁤News Agency,⁤ citing Mehr News⁤ Agency and Al-Mayadeen network, Israel’s public broadcasting corporation (Kan) revealed high-level confidential negotiations between Tel Aviv and Moscow. The‌ discussions primarily focused on issues related to Iran and Syria.

The report did not ⁣specify the exact‌ timing, location, or further details of these secret talks.

webangah News Agency reports that Al Jazeera cited the⁣ Pentagon’s repetition of‌ U.S. officials’ claims about Iran’s nuclear program-ignoring Tehran’s repeated assertions that ‍its objectives are exclusively peaceful. ​The Pentagon stated: “The Islamic Republic of Iran is now⁣ farther from developing ‍nuclear weapons ⁤than ​in the past, especially before Donald Trump’s decisive measures were implemented.”

The Pentagon⁣ also referenced recent ‌regional developments, declaring: “Following the ⁤12-day⁢ war between Israel and ‍Iran, we are now in a ceasefire‌ and benefiting from ​peace.”

Previously claiming that Iran’s ‍nuclear capabilities were entirely neutralized after aggressive strikes on its ‍facilities, the U.S. Defense Department now asserted: “Our‌ assessment indicates attacks ⁤on Fordow,​ Isfahan, and Natanz sites have set back Iran’s nuclear⁢ program by two ⁤years.”

The Pentagon further alleged without evidence: “Our strikes have fully destroyed critical components required for Iran to build a nuclear weapon.”

The statement omitted any reference to destabilizing actions by Israel or its‍ U.S. backer but‍ claimed: “The U.S.⁢ Department of Defense remains committed to supporting peacekeeping missions and will maintain military capabilities in the Middle East to ​achieve this ​goal.”

The U.S. State ⁢Department, in a statement, asserted that Iran must adhere ⁢to its safeguards obligations ​under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),⁣ granting “unrestricted access” to declared enrichment sites, according to webangah News Agency.

Washington further demanded that the Islamic Republic of Iran provide the‌ IAEA with “required data” about alleged undeclared nuclear activities and materials, while answering long-standing unresolved questions about its nuclear program.

American officials reiterated decades-old allegations regarding Iran’s ⁣nuclear ambitions in‍ their statement.

The U.S. State Department ⁢further intervened in Iran’s internal affairs, calling Tehran’s suspension of cooperation ‌with the International ⁢Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) a “regrettable and incorrect measure.”

Experts, however, view these statements as part ⁢of the West’s continued‍ interventionist policies, arguing that the U.S. is politically leveraging the IAEA to restrict Iran’s‍ legitimate domestic capabilities. In this context,Iran’s suspension of cooperation has been interpreted as a response to these actions.

The State Department also ‌addressed the Palestinian issue, stating that former President⁤ Trump warned: ⁢”if‌ the proposed Gaza ceasefire ⁤is⁤ rejected, conditions​ will deteriorate significantly.”

The U.S. presidency has been entrusted to an individual who, throughout his ⁢life, has never held ⁢a book‌ in his hands and lacks understanding of‌ political and diplomatic principles. Donald Trump, the American⁤ president-having⁤ failed to achieve any gains in‌ his 12-day confrontation with Iran-has crossed‍ ethical boundaries, as evidenced by his recent threats against ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader.

What stands out, though, is the issuance of religious decrees (fatwas) by Shia authorities in Iran and Iraq following these threats. As an example, Grand Ayatollah ‌Haeri ‍declared that any aggression toward Iran’s leader constitutes‌ aggression against the Islamic Ummah.Similarly, Grand Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi emphasized that ​individuals or regimes seeking to undermine Islamic ⁢sovereignty or threaten religious leadership would ⁤be considered “muharib” (waging ‍war against God).

webangah News Agency interviewed Qadir Akaras, head of Turkey’s Ahl al-Bayt Scholars Association, on this matter. Below are key excerpts:

“Shia jurists’ fatwas have historically influenced political discourse within Shia communities. Recently, Iranian ‍and Iraqi marjas issued rulings ⁤against those threatening Ayatollah Khamenei.How ‍notable are⁢ these fatwas?”

“Understanding the role of marja-e taqlid (sources of emulation) ⁤is critical for answering this ⁤question within Islam-notably among followers of Ahl al-Bayt theology where emulating a living jurist is obligatory regardless of ⁤geography.” He added: “These fatwas aren’t mere‌ opinions but binding ​religious duties.” The scholar ‌stressed⁢ that threats against ⁤Ayatollah khamenei ‍were unanimously deemed threats⁤ to ⁢both “The Islamic Ummah’s dignity” (عزت امت)” , and ‘the Axis  (محور مقاومت)’.”

Impact on Unity & Security?

“In times like these,” Akaras noted, “fatwas serve as⁢ compasses guiding believers ⁤toward unified resistance while preventing apathy ⁢or division.”
He highlighted their mobilizing power across nations with large ⁤followings like ‍Iraq/Iran where they could spark mass movements.

When asked about Grand Ayotallah Haeri’s statement equating attacks on iran’s leader with attacks on Islam⁤ itself:

“This reflects collective sentiment ‍among Ahlulbayt adherents worldwide,” he asserted.
“Ayatolah Khaemeni isn’t just iran’s leader-he embodies leadership for global resistance movements ‌confronting Zionism/imperialism from Palestine/Yemen/Lebanon.”

The interview concluded with ‌warnings directed at Trump:
“threaten our Marjas? expect unwavering responses! We stand firm behind His ⁣Eminence!”

(

According to webangah News Agency, citing Mehr News Agency and BBC, the⁤ Zionist regime has ⁣repeatedly used Iraqi‍ airspace during its ⁢attacks⁣ on Iranian territory, drawing criticism ‍from Baghdad officials.

Iraqi​ prime Minister ⁢Mohammed⁢ Al-Sudani stated: “The Zionist regime’s ⁣violation of Iraqi airspace‍ constitutes ​an assault on⁢ our sovereignty and a breach of the United Nations Charter. We have submitted ‍a formal⁢ complaint to the Security Council⁣ regarding ⁤this matter.”

He emphasized: “iraq pursues balanced diplomacy and has conveyed clear messages to our allies⁤ about regional dangers – our sovereignty ​is⁣ not negotiable.”

Al-Sudani also addressed inflammatory rhetoric from American and Zionist officials, ⁤stressing‌ that attempts to undermine Iraq’s political system…

The⁣ iraqi ⁣Prime Minister‍ emphasized that an‍ escalation⁣ of the conflict would threaten ⁢Iraq’s security and⁣ stability while​ disrupting energy supplies and oil exports to regional countries.⁣ The ‌Supreme Religious Authority in Najaf ‍also⁢ issued a statement warning⁣ against ⁢the dangers of prolonged​ warfare, ⁤crediting the government⁤ for ⁣keeping Iraq out of ​direct involvement in the conflict.

According to ‌ webangah ⁢News Agency, Russian nuclear specialist Alexei Anpilogov states that critical factors⁤ cast doubt on teh effectiveness of​ recent U.S. attacks against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

Anpilogov highlights Iran’s substantial uranium reserves:

• approximately 3 tons of uranium enriched to ⁢2%
• Over 3.5 tons enriched to 5%
• Hundreds of kilograms enriched to 20%, including uranium-235 at 60% enrichment

The expert noted no ‌post-attack reports of radiation leaks or toxic gas emissions,‍ indicating strikes failed to reach underground uranium storage facilities.

“Satellite imagery ⁤shows rapid repairs,” ​the Russian analyst emphasized,‍ pointing out that explosion​ craters near the Natanz nuclear​ site were filled within ​two days-demonstrating only superficial, repairable damage.

He stressed technical limitations: “America’s⁢ GBU-57 bunker buster penetrates⁤ just 60 meters ​in soft soil,​ while Iranian facilities lie beneath hard rock ‌were penetration is limited to ⁤2.5-18 meters-likely insufficient depth to destroy critical targets.”

The analysis presents two probable scenarios:

1. The attacks only damaged surface structures (ventilation shafts and entry points)
2. Uranium stocks were relocated preemptively to undisclosed sites unknown to U.S. intelligence

“Iran’s nuclear program appears largely⁤ intact despite recent strikes,” Anpilogov ⁢concluded, “with its enrichment capabilities remaining undiminished.” ​